What headlines has that boy been smoking??!!??
THEY ARE SAYING NO TREES BECAUSE IT FITS THE DESCRIPTION OF THE HURRICANE RATING. BUT . . . . .
Here’s a good shot of electrical system damage, but a category 1 or 2 will still do this, any hurricane will. (no hurricane is supposed to be easy!)
NOAA BUSTED: The Saffir Simpson scale is a SURFACE WIND SCALE
I did not know that, and it makes NOAA an EVEN BIGGER LIAR! The scale used to measure hurricane intensity does not take into account how high the winds are up inside the hurricane. I thought it did, because only that could explain how NOAA was rating the hurricanes, but it does not. That means even now, after strengthening, Maria only has 90 mph winds and NOAA is lying.
For real time updates on how huge NOAA is lying, CHECK THIS WIND MAP (it is the same one I have always linked) and watch NOAA spew falsehood after falsehood. The wind map will only be off by a few percent MAX. Click around on the hurricane and see what is really going on.
Here is the definition of a category 1 hurricane (and this is exactly what happened in Puerto Rico:
Category 1 74–95 mph
Very dangerous winds will produce some damage
Category 1 storms usually cause no significant structural damage to most well-constructed permanent structures; however, they can topple unanchored mobile homes, as well as uproot or snap weak trees. Poorly attached roof shingles or tiles can blow off. Coastal flooding and pier damage are often associated with Category 1 storms. Power outages are typically widespread to extensive, sometimes lasting several days. Even though it is the least intense type of hurricane, the storm can still produce widespread damage and can be a life-threatening storm
CHECK THE WIND SPEED MAP I LINKED. AT THE TIME OF THIS POSTING (1:45 PM CST) Maria is a category 1 storm regardless of what is on Drudge. The wind speed map is right, and that is all there is to it!
BOOM: PERFECT FACT CHECK ON PUERTO RICO!
55 MPH WINDS CONFIRMED BY THE BEUFORT SCALE.
THIS Wall street journal report says the damage in the photo below was caused by “25 foot waves”.
OK, NOW LOOK AT THE BEUFORT SCALE. WHAT WIND MAKES 25 FOOT WAVES? ANSWER: Winds between 47 and 54 MPH. OK; SO NOW, LOOK AT MY HURRICANE WIND MEASUREMENTS AGAIN, WHAT ARE THE WIND SPEEDS??!!?? HA HA HA, NAILED IT!!!!
Yeah, but 54 mph winds would never peel a roof back, like what is in that photo, RIGHT? Guess again, here is a close up of how poorly constructed the homes are in Puerto Rico! This lived, and it was right on the beach getting the full blast!
I was wrong about one thing though: There are a few destroyed homes and flipped cars in Puerto Rico, because “25 foot waves” were able to reach them. That’s not the same as having the wind do it, but I said nothing would be destroyed so I have to correct that because I did not think about wave damage.
The construction in Puerto Rico is so poor it would never be allowed in mainland America, and the photo above proves it. 155 mph winds? MY ***, please subtract 100 from that, and we will have a match both for what happened to such poor construction on the ground, and the Beufort scale.
The wave heights, when contrasted with the Beufort scale, prove what the winds were with a totally objective reference. There is no way NOAA or the scamming MSM will ever overcome what they have reported about wave heights. Once they said that, they provided a reference that cannot be refuted. They are irrevocably busted by the Beufort scale, category 1/tropical storm CONFIRMED. Keep in mind that no admissions will be made, because there is a phoney global warming agenda to uphold, and for that agenda to succeed they need their “super storms”. Also keep in mind that Drudge is nothing but a headline parrot who posts bullshit frequently because of that so his sensational headlines are meaningless.
As a rebuttal, before it is needed
It will obviously be argued that my wind samples of Maria on Puerto Rico are irrelevant, because at the time they were taken, Maria was weakened by the mountains. But that won’t work because:
During the weather mod portion of the report, where I reported clear evidence of weather mod pumping up Maria, I posted a capture of Maria just as it was making landfall. That capture proves the winds were not over 85 mph (as I stated) because the wind map starts to turn purple after that. Since the capture has only wind speeds up to whatever red will cover, it means these winds were between 59 and 85 mph but there is no way to know exactly what they were because I was only interested in showing the weather mod in progress and not the actual wind speed so I did not sample the wind. Here is that capture that proves beyond a doubt the 155 mph winds were B.S. because the map progresses all the way through purple to white before 155 mph is reached. If it is all red, it is category 1 or less.
Also to repeat yesterday, Magic Box wrote and said the square artifacts were due to the sampling. However, with the exact same sampling, Jose to the North had no artifacts (this is all posted below)
BUSTED: HURRICANE MARIA IS OBVIOUSLY SYNTHETIC, AND THEY ARE PUSHING THE SYSTEM SO HARD THAT MARIA HAS A SQUARE WIND PATTERN
THIS PATTERN HAS BEEN PERSISTENT FOR HOURS AND IS NOT A RADAR ANOMALY. YOU CAN’T GET SQUARE WIND PATTERNS IN A NATURAL HURRICANE, BUSTED!!!!!
Maria making landfall in Puerto Rico with 85 mph or less surface winds:
I posted the following to a popular forum
It is good enough to post here.
If the power is out in Puerto rico for any more than a week or two it will be caused politically. Since nothing happened of substance, (it is well documented that NOAA lied, and that Puerto Rico had no winds anywhere over 85 mph,) they can at least keep the power cut to create the illusion of “devastation” for the masses outside of Puerto Rico.
The illusion might hold, I was 100 miles away from landfall for Patricia – the “category 6” mega cane that hit Mexico and did practically nothing, and you can go to Manzanilla and talk to people and they brag about their “category 6” that did not wipe out a single home, my god people are clueless and just parrot the authorities even when reality is obviously not as stated by them. Carbon tax Ahoy!
Most of the outages in Puerto rico were caused by poorly strung wires running through trees that were not properly cut away from the wires (like what gets done everywhere, even in Mexico,) because they were too lazy and short sighted to do proper maintenance. Even a brief perusal of Google images confirms this, and also confirms that there was no damage to anything that was not built like a shack.
The other problem is laziness, no one there is going to work hard to get the power back on. There were plenty of real outages simply because proper maintenance in the form of removing hazardous trees was never done. Hazardous trees go down in 60 mph winds. If these were not taken care of ahead of time, you can bet worker attitudes are going to keep the power out a lot longer than it has to be.
Look at how they strung their electrical in the aftermath pictures – a lot of the outages were caused by cheap tin roofs cutting extension cord quality wire while the houses the tin came from are perfectly intact sans tin roof, despite 2×3 construction. They did not even use 2×4’s on EXTERIOR walls, yet all the houses are still standing, sans the occasional roof. That would not be possible after a significant hurricane.
Many island states are built the same, perfectly acceptable construction in many is 2×2 walls that end up being three inches thick once the sheathing is applied. Many times island states shoot straight for the bottom because the climate is so favorable they don’t need protection from the elements . . . .until a hurricane arrives, which is like, “almost never.”
The trollage on the topic is astounding. Clearly someone does not want word of a borderline fake hurricane (that might have been only a tropical storm) getting out, because there is a global warming agenda to uphold.
Just surf Google images, plenty is getting out of puerto rico but the MSM does not want to publish it because what actually happened on the ground does not fit the carbon tax climate change story line of a mega hurricane.
Unfortunately we live in an era where NOAA and the USGS can’t be trusted, for example, the Mexico quake HAD TO have been more than a 7.1 but they are not publishing that. It seems that for whatever political agenda there is, we can’t get the truth anywhere anymore.
RedPill Signing off…